People should not be allowed to

Spinning an encounter that you initiated as some harrowing ordeal so you can play the victim?

buzzfeed secrets

Imagine a society that simply denied these idiots the option of snitching. You want to help them oppress and punish and be thanked in kind for your vigilance.

Hate this idea?

buzzfeed 3019

Do you participate in any where you can be anonymous? You might realize you enjoy not making a federal case out of every brush with diversity. Because of course she did. Something in between? Do you participate in online networks, Web sites and activities where you are identified?

With all due respect, however, that seems like a last resort.

People should not be allowed to

Do you participate in any where you can be anonymous? Do you participate in online networks, Web sites and activities where you are identified? Or should they be required to identify themselves? You might realize you enjoy not making a federal case out of every brush with diversity. Please use only your first name. The greater threat is from crazy people who can't control their emotions - the very type of people who complain about being upset by anonymous posts. Submit Yes, People should The counterarguments are stupid. They say stuff like "we don't get anonymity in real life". The debate over identity has material consequences. Data that is tied to real people is valuable for businesses and government authorities alike. Today people put their personal information all over the internet on facebook and the like with real names and they do end up murdered, Kidnapped, Assaulted, Etc. Hint: the presence of armed authorities is more dangerous for one of those demographics — the one that faces a disproportionate level of deadly police violence. Major Internet companies like Google, Facebook and Twitter have a valuable stake in this debate — and, in some cases, vastly different corporate philosophies on the issue that signal their own ambitions. You see articles all the time of some psycho going to someone's house and taking revenge over an internet post.

Students 13 and older are invited to comment below. The debate over identity has material consequences.

American buzzfeed

You want to help them oppress and punish and be thanked in kind for your vigilance. Hate this idea? If they're likely to get angry or upset by a post, To the extent they equate it to a violent act, Do you think they're not already unhinged enough to respond to those posts with actual violence? Today people put their personal information all over the internet on facebook and the like with real names and they do end up murdered, Kidnapped, Assaulted, Etc. Do you walk around with your contact information written on your chest? Spinning an encounter that you initiated as some harrowing ordeal so you can play the victim? The conflict has given more attention to the whole question of identity online. You might realize you enjoy not making a federal case out of every brush with diversity. Yes we do. Facebook insists on what it calls authentic identity, or real names. Or should they be required to identify themselves? When a child proves they cannot be trusted with a privilege, you take it away, and white people are behaving like irresponsible fucking children. Should people be allowed to be anonymous, or obscure their identities, online? Students 13 and older are invited to comment below. Submit Yes, People should The counterarguments are stupid.
Rated 6/10 based on 21 review
Download
16 Things That Should Not Be Allowed